Alert for Checkpoint Shareholders: Consider Selling Amidst Merger with Sun Pharma – Contact Julie Holleman for Financial Guidance

Investigation into Checkpoint Therapeutics’ Proposed Sale to Sun Pharmaceutical: Potential Conflicts of Interest

New York, March 10, 2025 – Shareholders of Checkpoint Therapeutics, Inc. (CKPT) may want to pay close attention to an ongoing investigation by Julie & Holleman LLP regarding the proposed sale of the biotech company to Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. The law firm is raising concerns about potential conflicts of interest related to Checkpoint’s controlling shareholder, Fortress Biotech, Inc. (FBIO).

Background of the Proposed Sale

Checkpoint Therapeutics, a clinical-stage biotechnology company, announced on February 27, 2025, that it had entered into a definitive agreement to be acquired by Sun Pharmaceutical for $4.10 per share in cash. The deal, which is subject to customary closing conditions, is expected to be completed in the second quarter of 2025.

The Role of Fortress Biotech

Fortress Biotech, which owns approximately 65% of Checkpoint’s outstanding shares, stands to significantly benefit from the sale. In addition to its controlling stake, Fortress Biotech will receive a $30 million breakup fee if the deal does not go through. The law firm is questioning whether Fortress Biotech’s interests are aligned with those of other Checkpoint shareholders.

Investigation Details

Julie & Holleman LLP is inviting Checkpoint shareholders to contact them for a free consultation if they have any concerns about the proposed sale. The law firm is particularly interested in hearing from shareholders who may have information related to the following:

  • The valuation of Checkpoint Therapeutics and the rationale for the proposed sale price
  • The potential impact of the sale on Checkpoint’s business, operations, and employees
  • Any conflicts of interest or potential breaches of fiduciary duty by Checkpoint’s board of directors or management
  • The role of Fortress Biotech in the negotiations and the terms of the deal

Implications for Individual Investors

For individual investors, the investigation into the proposed sale of Checkpoint Therapeutics to Sun Pharmaceutical could potentially impact their investment decisions. If the law firm uncovers any material information that calls into question the fairness of the sale price or the potential conflicts of interest, it could lead to a drop in Checkpoint’s stock price. Conversely, if the investigation finds no wrongdoing, the sale could proceed as planned, and Checkpoint shareholders may choose to accept the offer.

Global Implications

Beyond individual investors, the investigation could also have broader implications for the biotech industry and corporate governance as a whole. If it is found that Fortress Biotech’s interests were not aligned with those of other Checkpoint shareholders, it could lead to increased scrutiny of similar situations in the future. It could also potentially lead to changes in regulations or best practices to prevent such conflicts of interest from arising in the first place.

Conclusion

The investigation into the proposed sale of Checkpoint Therapeutics to Sun Pharmaceutical by Julie & Holleman LLP highlights the importance of transparency and fairness in corporate transactions. As the biotech industry continues to evolve, it is crucial that all stakeholders, including shareholders, are given accurate and timely information about the deals that could impact their investments. Only then can we ensure that the market remains fair and efficient for all participants.

Individual investors should stay informed about the investigation’s progress and consider seeking professional advice if they have concerns about their Checkpoint holdings. The biotech industry and the broader business community should also take note of the potential implications of this case and work towards preventing similar conflicts of interest from arising in the future. Only by working together can we maintain confidence in the integrity of the market and the fairness of corporate transactions.

Leave a Reply