US Treasury’s Controversial Move to Dismiss Tornado.cash Case Before Final Ruling Sparks Outcry

The Tornado.cash Saga: A Legal Battle Between Crypto and Regulation

The US Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has found itself in the crosshairs of the crypto community following its recent decision to delist Tornado.cash from its Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List). The crypto-mixing protocol, which allows users to obfuscate the origin and destination of their transactions, has been under fire since OFAC added it to the list in August 2022, citing its use in money laundering and other illicit activities. However, the department’s claim that the final court ruling on the lawsuit challenging the designation is now moot has sparked controversy.

The Legal Battle

The lawsuit, filed by Tornado.cash and its developer, argues that the OFAC’s designation violates their constitutional rights, including freedom of speech and property rights. The plaintiffs have requested a preliminary injunction to stop the enforcement of the sanctions while the case proceeds. In response, the government has argued that the plaintiffs have not shown a likelihood of success on the merits of their claims.

Despite the government’s assertion that the court ruling is moot, Coinbase’s Chief Legal Officer (CLO), Paul Grewal, has taken a different stance. In a tweet thread, Grewal argued that the final court ruling is necessary to provide clarity and prevent further attacks on the protocol. He also noted that delisting from the SDN List does not mean that Tornado.cash is no longer sanctioned, and that users and service providers must still comply with other applicable sanctions.

Impact on the Individual

For individual users of Tornado.cash, the removal from the SDN List may seem like a victory. However, it is important to note that the sanctions against the protocol have not been lifted. This means that users who continue to use the service may still be in violation of other sanctions, depending on the jurisdiction and the nature of their transactions. It is crucial for users to consult with legal and financial advisors to ensure they are in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.

Impact on the World

The Tornado.cash saga has far-reaching implications for the crypto industry as a whole. The case highlights the ongoing tension between crypto and regulation, and the challenges of balancing innovation with the need for financial security and anti-money laundering measures. It also underscores the importance of clear and consistent regulation, as well as effective communication between regulators and the crypto community.

Conclusion

The Tornado.cash lawsuit is a complex legal battle with significant implications for the crypto industry. While the removal of the protocol from the SDN List may be seen as a step in the right direction, it is important to remember that the sanctions against the protocol have not been lifted. Users and service providers must continue to comply with all applicable laws and regulations. The case also serves as a reminder of the importance of clear and consistent regulation, effective communication between regulators and the crypto community, and the need to balance innovation with financial security and anti-money laundering measures.

  • The US Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has delisted Tornado.cash from its Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List).
  • The plaintiffs in the lawsuit challenging the designation have argued that it violates their constitutional rights, including freedom of speech and property rights.
  • Coinbase’s Chief Legal Officer (CLO) has argued that a final court ruling is necessary to provide clarity and prevent further attacks on the protocol.
  • Users and service providers must continue to comply with all applicable laws and regulations, even if the protocol is no longer on the SDN List.
  • The case highlights the ongoing tension between crypto and regulation, and the challenges of balancing innovation with financial security and anti-money laundering measures.

Leave a Reply